Menu Close

COVID 19 in Syria: 66 New Cases in 24 Hours, 4 Deaths, 51 Recoveries

Coronavirus COVID 19 cases in Syria stats - Syria News syrianews.cc

COVID 19 total cases discovered so far in Syria have reached 6552 cases, the Syrian Ministry of Health stated that in the past 24 hours sixty-six new cases of COVID 19 have been discovered, four cases died, and fifty-one cases recovered.

The totals as of today:
6552 positive cases discovered
2609 cases recovered
337 patients died while positive with COVID 19

3606 total number of active cases of COVID 19

The newly discovered sixty-six cases per province were as follows:
24 in Homs
08 in Tartous
07 in Damascus countryside
07 in Sweida
05 in Hama
05 in Damascus
05 in Aleppo
05 in Daraa

The four death cases per province reported as follows:
02 in Homs
01 in Aleppo
01 in Damascus

The fifty-one recovered cases reported as follows:
09 in Damascus
09 in Aleppo
08 in Homs
07 in Damascus countryside
06 in Latakia
03 in Tartous
03 in Daraa
03 in Hama
03 in Sweida

Syria discovered the first case on 22nd March 2020, and the first patient died while positive with the virus was a week later on 29th of March.

The Syrian healthcare system is suffering greatly from the prolonged War of Terror waged against Syria by the USA and its cronies, the incremental sanctions targeting the healthcare system directly and indirectly through sanctions imposed by the USA and its EU and regional stooges on the Syrian banking system and trade routes and partners despite numerous calls to end these sanctions.

We do know that reporting on these figures cause great controversy, especially among skeptics who literally call this as ‘scamdemic’ instead of pandemic, however, we are conveying what the Syrian ministry of health is reporting, and do keep in mind that Syria does not have the means to independently carry out extensive and expansive researches on the disease to what the vast majority of countries worldwide couldn’t do, and they aren’t subjected to a war of terror and war of attrition waged against them by the world’s superpowers and super-rich regimes. The figures provided by the Ministry of Health are not absolute figures as the country can not carry out testing with 100% accuracy on all the population, therefore, it’ll be highly appreciated if critics can focus their efforts on discrediting the capable countries; and those who believe the pandemic is real to help Syria by advocating the lifting of the sanctions by lobbying their governments and by helping us carry out our mission by sharing the news we’re conveying from Syria from the reliable sources we depend on.

You can also leave comments on our updates expressing your views, we welcome all objective comments.

To help us continue, please visit the Donate page to donate or learn how to help us with no cost.
Follow us on Telegram: http://t.me/syupdates link will open the Telegram app.

3 Comments

  1. crisscross767

    Assumption 2: The PCR Test for COVID is Accurate

    As I covered in previous articles, the PCR test (Polymerase Chain Reaction) was invented by scientist Kary Mullis as a manufacturing technique (since it can able to replicate DNA sequences millions and billions of times), not as a diagnostic tool. COVID or SARS-CoV2 fails Koch’s postulates. The virus which shut the world down has still to this day never been isolated, purified and re-injected, or in other words, has never been 100% proven to exist, nor 100% proven to be the cause of the disease. When used to determine the cause of a disease, the PCR test has many flaws:

    There is no gold standard to which to compare its results (COVID fails Koch’s postulates);
    It detects and amplifies genetic code (RNA sequences) but offers no proof these RNA sequences are of viral origin;
    It generates many false positive results; and
    Even a positive result does not guarantee the discovered ‘virus’ is the cause of the disease!

    That is staggeringly useless! Here is a quote from the article COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless:

    “Tests need to be evaluated to determine their preciseness — strictly speaking their “sensitivity” and “specificity” — by comparison with a “gold standard,” meaning the most accurate method available. As an example, for a pregnancy test the gold standard would be the pregnancy itself. But as Australian infectious diseases specialist Sanjaya Senanayake, for example, stated in an ABC TV interview in an answer to the question “How accurate is the [COVID-19] testing?”:

    If we had a new test for picking up [the bacterium] golden staph in blood, we’ve already got blood cultures, that’s our gold standard we’ve been using for decades, and we could match this new test against that. But for COVID-19 we don’t have a gold standard test.”

    Jessica C. Watson from Bristol University confirms this. In her paper “Interpreting a COVID-19 test result”, published recently in The British Medical Journal, she writes that there is a “lack of such a clear-cut ‘gold-standard’ for COVID-19 testing.”“

    Here is the admission about the PCR test by the CDC and FDA:

    “Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms …this test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens.”

    Accurate would be about the last word I would use to describe COVID PCR testing, yet it is currently the standard test worldwide for COVID. Another magnificent example of many COVID assumptions. Go figure.

    https://thefreedomarticles.com/busted-11-covid-assumptions-based-on-fear-not-fact/

  2. crisscross767

    Not only do drugmakers make huge profits from vaccines, but they continue to profit from the illnesses they cause.

    If vaccines weren’t harmful to health, why would pharmaceutical companies be exempt from liability?

    This goose has been laying a golden egg for more than a century, at an indescribable toll in human suffering.

    Now they want to make vaccinations – not one but regular shots — a condition for participation in society and freedom.

    “The practice of medicine may not be the world’s oldest profession, but it is often seen to be operating on much the same principles.” – Eustace Mullins

    Eustace Mullins 1923-2010 excerpt from his book “Murder by Injection”

    The practice of immunization goes directly against the discovery of modern holistic medical experts that the body has a natural immune defense against illness. The Church of Modern Medicine claims that we can only be absolved from the peril of infection by the Holy Water of vaccination, injecting into the system a foreign body of infection, which will then perform a Medical Miracle, and will confer life-long immunity, hence the term, “immunization.” The greatest heresy any physician can commit is to voice publicly any doubt of any one of the Four Holy Waters, but the most deeply entrenched in modern medical practice is undoubtedly the numerous vaccination programs. They are also the most consistently profitable operations of the Medical Monopoly. Yet one physician, Dr. Henry R. Bybee, of Norfolk, Virginia, has publicly stated, “My honest opinion is that vaccine is the cause of more disease and suffering than anything I could name. I believe that such diseases as cancer, syphilis, cold sores and many other disease conditions are the direct results of vaccination. Yet, in the state of Virginia, and in many other states, parents are compelled to submit their children to this procedure while the medical profession not only receives its pay for this service, but also makes splendid and prospective patients for the future.” (p.79) —

    https://www.henrymakow.com/2020/11/vaccines-the-oldest-scam.html

  3. crisscross767

    Antibodies in Recovered COVID-19 Patients Fade Quickly, Study Says

    Vaccines as far as ‘corona’ cold and flu prevention is concerned appear then to be pointless
    Is it simply just a money making scam for big pharma, or is there another agenda?
    Freemason Scomo lives in “The Lodge”. Does he take his orders from the “Grand Master”?

    “Antibody levels in the blood of coronavirus patients drop quickly after the body clears the virus, according to a new study published in mBio, an open access journal of the American Society for Microbiology.

    For convalescent plasma to help patients who currently have COVID-19, the donated blood needs to be collected soon after recovery. Under current guidelines, however, patients can’t donate blood until 14 days after symptoms have resolved, and most donations occur even later.

    “We don’t want to transfuse the virus, just transfuse the antibodies. But at the same time, our work shows that the capacity of the plasma to neutralize viral particles is going down during those first weeks,” Andres Finzi, PhD, one of the study authors and a microbiologist at the University of Montreal in Canada, said in a statement.

    The research team analyzed blood samples from 31 people recovering from COVID-19 and measured antibodies at 1-month intervals. Overall, the immunoglobulins that neutralize the virus dropped about 6 to 10 weeks after symptoms began. The ability of the antibodies to neutralize the virus also fell during that time.

    In previous studies, researchers found that antibodies peak around 2 to 3 weeks after symptoms begin and fall after that. Finzi and his colleagues have also found that the ability to neutralize the virus decreases after that — about 3 to 6 weeks after symptoms begin.

    Antibodies block the “spike” protein on SARS-CoV-2 that allows the virus to invade a cell in the body. They neutralize the coronavirus by preventing it from locking into a host’s cells and replicating.

    Scientists aren’t sure whether the neutralizing function drives the efficacy of convalescent plasma use in COVID-19 patients, Finzi and the research team wrote. If so, recovered patients should be allowed to donate as soon as possible, they said.

    “Efforts should be made to ensure that convalescent plasma is collected as soon as possible after recovery of the donor from active infection,” they wrote.

    mBio. 2020;11:e02590-20. Full text

    EurekAlert. Published October 16, 2020. Full text

    https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/939372?nlid=137901_5404&src=wnl_dne_201020_mscpedit&uac=373954PG&impID=2629145&faf=1

Comments:

Related Posts

donate
%d bloggers like this: