What if Trump arrests Putin in Alaska? Well, do not bother, the Russian media tells us it would be the reason for war.
Stefan H. Heuer, M.A.
Aug. 15, 2025
I follow a German blogger residing in Russia. He has repeatedly demonstrated his support for the narrative of an alleged dichotomy between the West and Russia. That this narrative, promoted by the Kremlin, has already proved itself to be utterly false, does not seem to bother him like all the other stars of the theater.
I do not trust his analysis (either he lacks capabilities or has a more materialistic reason), but I profit from his translations of Russian articles. Today, I stumbled over an article on a topic that, due to the localization of the meeting of Trump and Putin on a US army base in Alaska, has made me suspicious– the question of what would be the result if Trump decides to arrest Putin in Alaska.
You find this article here.
The following is a translated quotation from the Russian article:
“This raises the crucial question: What will Moscow do if, during negotiations abroad, force majeure occurs and attempts are made to detain the Russian president against his will?
Such a move would automatically become a casus belli, an indisputable reason for war. Faced with the threat of a direct attack on the president, the Russian military command would most likely put its strategic deterrent forces—missile systems, aircraft, fleets, including nuclear weapons—on high alert. Even if no direct strike follows, this will be a signal of readiness for any scenario. Russia could then launch limited military or cyber operations against strategic facilities in NATO countries or critical infrastructure, thereby demonstrating that aggression against its president has immediate consequences. […]”
First of all: Has anyone throughout history been detained against his will? Maybe someone better in history than I could enlighten me.
But I digress. The key point is the question of the possible consequences of such an act. And in this context, the Russian author has cooked up a truly tasty dish for us: Such an action would be a cause for war and would inevitably result in a Russian response.
So, as a German living in a city with an illegal NATO facility, I am now beginning to shift uneasily in my seat, picturing in my mind’s eye Russian missiles striking this very NATO facility, whose command center is located in the middle of the city and which serves to monitor Russian naval movements in the Baltic Sea.
Great! And now, as the cherry on top of the cake: the typical whistling in the woods of the Chabad goyim:
“Will the US decide to risk the health or even the lives of its citizens for such an adventure? The probability is extremely low.
Furthermore, according to the Wall Street Journal, citing informed sources, Trump has decided not to invite Zelensky to Alaska so as not to jeopardize negotiations with Putin. From the outset of the meeting, the US president expressed concern that the Ukrainian leader’s participation could complicate the negotiation process.”
I’m not slipping anymore, I’m getting myself a shot of Schnapps…
“The probability is extremely low,“ writes that guy, for proper evidence citing… a publication by the East Coast plutocracy. You can not make this up!
- Sure, Trump didn’t have Iranian General Qassem Soleimani assassinated in Baghdad.
- Of course, Trump did not threaten Iran with destruction and praised the Israelis for assassinating key Iranian scientists and diplomats.
- Of course, Trump did not illegally attack Iran.
- Of course, Trump did not escalate the proxy war against Russia via Ukraine during his first term in office.
- Of course, Trump did not recently end Moscow’s influence in the South Caucasus (excellent analysis here).
- Of course, Trump did not escalate the proxy war against Syria (sending US troops to Syria, who took over the oil wells and have been exploiting them ever since, supporting ISIS and the Kurds) and personally ordered cruise missile strikes against Syria based on a lie, using missiles manufactured by a company in which he held shares.
- Of course, Trump did not give Israel the green light for genocide in Gaza – including weapons for it.
No, no, it’s all completely different – keywords: “4D chess” – “Q” – “Trust The Plan.” Or short: MAGA!
Trump is a cute little fluffy orange teddy bear in a petting zoo… and I need another shot of Schnapps.
How thick does the board in front of your head have to be?
But regardless of the Kremlin choir’s songs: Why is Putin, the supposedly clever intelligence officer, exposing himself to this risk – especially since things are supposedly going so well for him on the front lines?
Well…
Perhaps because Trump is not the president of the United States, but the managing director of the Washington branch of Chabad-Lubavitch, and Putin is not the Russian president, but the managing director of the Moscow branch of Chabad-Lubavitch.
Let us remember that world ‘Jewry,’ of which Chabad is undoubtedly an aggressive and influential representative, wants to stage THREE major world wars to enforce its world domination and the coming of its satanic Messiah.
Dear friends, if we soon see interesting mushroom-shaped clouds rising where our capitals are (were) located, I would like to say now: it was great knowing you.
Stefan H. Heuer, M.A.
Historian, born in 1964, has worked as a lecturer in adult education and, among others,
in Human resources development for a US-American company in Germany.
Syria News serves as a vital archive and a source of independent journalism, frequently used for research and as a historical record. To preserve this crucial resource and continue our work, we rely on reader support.
Your donation directly maintains the platform and upholds a space for truth.
You can also donate with Cryptocurrencies through our donate page.
Thank you in advance.
